Latest & greatest articles for colorectal cancer

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on colorectal cancer or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on colorectal cancer and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for colorectal cancer

1. Ripretinib (Qinlock) - To treat advanced gastrointestinal-stromal tumors

Ripretinib (Qinlock) - To treat advanced gastrointestinal-stromal tumors Drug Approval Package: QINLOCK U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Search FDA Submit search Drug Approval Package: QINLOCK Company: Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLC Application Number: 213973 Approval Date: 05/15/2020 Persons with disabilities having problems accessing the PDF files below may call (301) 796-3634 for assistance. FDA Approval Letter and Labeling (PDF) (PDF) FDA Application Review Files (PDF) (PDF

2020 FDA - Drug Approval Package

2. Is 45 really the new 50 in colorectal cancer screening?

Is 45 really the new 50 in colorectal cancer screening? Tools for Practice is proudly sponsored by the Alberta College of Family Physicians (ACFP). ACFP is a provincial, professional voluntary organization, representing more than 4,800 family physicians, family medicine residents, and medical students in Alberta. Established over sixty years ago, the ACFP strives for excellence in family practice through advocacy, continuing medical education and primary care research. www.acfp.ca June 29, 2020 (...) Is 45 really the new 50 in colorectal cancer screening? Clinical Question: Should we lower the age that average risk patients commence colorectal cancer screening from 50 to 45? Bottom Line: In developed countries, the incidence of colorectal cancer in persons under 50 years old has increased by 20-30% in the last 20 years. However, the absolute risk increase is only 1-4 per 100,000 persons. Screening average risk patients under age 50 should not be encouraged at this time. Evidence: • Population

2020 Tools for Practice

3. Short-term Outcomes of Single-port Versus Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer: The SIMPLE Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

2017 at 7 sites in Korea. A total of 388 adults (aged 19-85 yrs) with clinical stage I, II, or III adenocarcinoma of the ascending or sigmoid colon were enrolled and randomized. The primary endpoint was 30-day postoperative complication rates. Secondary endpoints were the number of harvested lymph nodes, length of the resection margin, postoperative pain, and time to functional recovery (bowel movement and diet). Patients were followed for 30 days after surgery. Results: Among 388 patients, 359 (...) Short-term Outcomes of Single-port Versus Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer: The SIMPLE Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Short-term Outcomes of Single-port Versus Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer: The SIMPLE Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial - PubMed This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable

2020 EvidenceUpdates

4. A systematic mixed studies review of health behaviour change interventions in colorectal cancer survivors

A systematic mixed studies review of health behaviour change interventions in colorectal cancer survivors A systematic mixed studies review of health behaviour change interventions in colorectal cancer survivors - PubMed This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. National Institutes of Health National Library of Medicine National (...) RSS Cancel RSS Link Copy Actions Cite Share Permalink Copy Page navigation Review J Adv Nurs Actions . 2020 Apr 13. doi: 10.1111/jan.14389. Online ahead of print. A systematic mixed studies review of health behaviour change interventions in colorectal cancer survivors , , , Affiliations Expand Affiliation 1 School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. PMID: 32281687 DOI: Item in Clipboard Review A systematic mixed studies review

2020 EvidenceUpdates

5. Cancer prevention with aspirin in hereditary colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome), 10-year follow-up and registry-based 20-year data in the CAPP2 study: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Cancer prevention with aspirin in hereditary colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome), 10-year follow-up and registry-based 20-year data in the CAPP2 study: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lynch syndrome is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer and with a broader spectrum of cancers, especially endometrial cancer. In 2011, our group reported long-term cancer outcomes (mean follow-up 55·7 months [SD 31·4]) for participants with Lynch syndrome enrolled (...) outcomes were monitored for at least 10 years from recruitment with English, Finnish, and Welsh participants being monitored for up to 20 years. The primary endpoint was development of colorectal cancer. Analysis was by intention to treat and per protocol. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN59521990.Between January, 1999, and March, 2005, 937 eligible patients with Lynch syndrome, mean age 45 years, commenced treatment, of whom 861 agreed to be randomly assigned

2020 Lancet

6. Simultaneous Versus Delayed Resection for Initially Resectable Synchronous Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A Prospective, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Trial

of Digestive, Endocrine, Oncologic and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospital, François Rabelais University, Tours, France. 10 Department of Hepatobiliary, Oncologic and Transplant Surgery, AP-HP, Paul Brousse Hospital, Paris-Sud University, Villejuif, France. PMID: 32209911 DOI: Item in Clipboard Full-text links Cite Abstract Objective: To answer whether synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases (SLM) should be resected simultaneously with primary cancer or should be delayed. Summary (...) background data: Numerous studies have compared both strategies. All were retrospective and conclusions were contradictory. Methods: Adults with colorectal cancer and resectable SLM were randomly assigned to either simultaneous or delayed resection of the metastases. The primary outcome was the rate of major complications within 60 days following surgery. Secondary outcomes included overall and disease-free survival. Results: A total of 105 patients were recruited. Eighty-five patients (39 and 46

2020 EvidenceUpdates

7. Upfront FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab and reintroduction after progression versus mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab followed by FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TRIBE2): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, rand Full Text available with Trip Pro

: TRIBE2 was an open-label, phase 3, randomised study of patients aged 18-75 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2, with unresectable, previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer, recruited from 58 Italian oncology units. Patients were stratified according to centre, ECOG performance status, primary tumour location, and previous adjuvant chemotherapy. A randomisation system incorporating a minimisation algorithm was used to randomly assign patients (1:1 (...) , and one sepsis). Interpretation: Upfront FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab followed by the reintroduction of the same regimen after disease progression seems to be a preferable therapeutic strategy to sequential administration of chemotherapy doublets, in combination with bevacizumab, for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer selected according to the study criteria. Funding: The GONO Cooperative Group, the ARCO Foundation, and F Hoffmann-La Roche. Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

2020 EvidenceUpdates

8. Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality After a Single Negative Screening Colonoscopy. (Abstract)

Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality After a Single Negative Screening Colonoscopy. Current guidelines recommend a 10-year interval between screening colonoscopies, but evidence is limited.To assess the long-term risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) and death from CRC after a high- and low-quality single negative screening colonoscopy.Observational study.Polish Colonoscopy Screening Program.Average-risk individuals aged 50 to 66 years who had a single negative colonoscopy (...) (no neoplastic findings).Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) of CRC after high- and low-quality single negative screening colonoscopy. High-quality colonoscopy included a complete examination, with adequate bowel preparation, performed by endoscopists with an adenoma detection rate of 20% or greater.Among 165 887 individuals followed for up to 17.4 years, CRC incidence (0.28 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.30]) and mortality (0.19 [CI, 0.16 to 0.21]) were 72% and 81% lower

2020 Annals of Internal Medicine

9. TAS-102 with or without bevacizumab in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: an investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial

TAS-102 with or without bevacizumab in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: an investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial TAS-102 With or Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Chemorefractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Investigator-Initiated, Open-Label, Randomised, Phase 2 Trial - PubMed This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Clipboard, Search History, and several other (...) for external citation management software Create file Cancel Actions Cite Share Permalink Copy Page navigation Lancet Oncol Actions . 2020 Mar;21(3):412-420. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30827-7. Epub 2020 Jan 27. TAS-102 With or Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Chemorefractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Investigator-Initiated, Open-Label, Randomised, Phase 2 Trial , , , , , , , , , Affiliations Expand Affiliations 1 Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department

2020 EvidenceUpdates

10. Effect of Multimodal Prehabilitation vs Postoperative Rehabilitation on 30-Day Postoperative Complications for Frail Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Effect of Multimodal Prehabilitation vs Postoperative Rehabilitation on 30-Day Postoperative Complications for Frail Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial Effect of Multimodal Prehabilitation vs Postoperative Rehabilitation on 30-Day Postoperative Complications for Frail Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial - PubMed This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete (...) results Optional text in email: Save Cancel Create a file for external citation management software Create file Cancel Actions Cite Share Permalink Copy Page navigation JAMA Surg Actions . 2020 Jan 22;155(3):233-242. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5474. Online ahead of print. Effect of Multimodal Prehabilitation vs Postoperative Rehabilitation on 30-Day Postoperative Complications for Frail Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2020 EvidenceUpdates

11. Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

adenomas 5 mm in size. Future studies may clarify whether length- ening the interval beyond 10 years may be possible. A 10- year follow-up after normal colonoscopy is recommended regardless of indication for the colonoscopy, except for in- dividuals at increased risk for CRC, such as those with his- tory of a hereditary CRC syndrome, personal history of in?ammatory bowel disease, personal history of hereditary cancer syndrome, serrated polyposis syndrome, malignant polyp, personal history of CRC (...) is in keeping with their values and preferences. This article does not include recommendations for follow-up for individuals with hereditary CRC syndromes (eg, Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis), in?ammatory bowel disease, a personal history of CRC (includingmalignantpolyps),familyhistoryofCRCorcolo- rectal neoplasia, or serrated polyposis syndrome. As such, our recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy do not apply to these groups except in cases where polyp ?ndings

2020 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

12. Endoscopic Removal of Colorectal Lesions—Recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

?brosis,local residual early carcinoma after endoscopic resection, and non-polypoid colorectal dysplasia in patients with in?ammatory bowel disease. 109 The technique of ESD involves an endoscopic knife for cuttingandsubmucosalinjectantforlifting.Aftersubmuco- sal injection, a circumferential incision is performed to isolate the lesion with 3 or 4 mm surrounding normal mu- cosa. The submucosa under the lesion is injected further. With controlled movements under direct view facilitated with the use (...) months to assess for local recurrence and to clear the colon of synchronous lesions. There is a very high prevalence of synchronous disease in patients with lesions 20 mm. In a large EMR referral cohort with lesions 20 mm, patients had an average of 4 additional conventional adenomas; 40% had an additional advanced adenoma; 20% had an additional lesion 20 mm; and 0.8% had a synchronous cancer not detected by the refer- ring physician. Of those referred for removal of a serrated lesion, 30% had

2020 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

13. Regional Therapies for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Regional Therapies for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Guideline 2-30a A Quality Initiative of the Program in Evidence-Based Care (PEBC), Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Regional Therapies for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases P. Karanicolas, R. Beecroft, R. Cosby, E. David, M. Kalyvas, E. Kennedy, G. Sapisochin, R. Wong, K. Zbuk and the Gastrointestinal Disease Site Group Report Date: March 10, 2020 For information about this document, please contact Dr. Paul Karanicolas or Dr. Robert (...) randomization to disease progression. Guideline 2-30a Section 3: Guideline Methods Overview - March 10, 2020 Page 9 Regional Therapies for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Section 3: Guideline Methods Overview This section summarizes the methods used to create the guideline. For the systematic review, see Section 4. THE PROGRAM IN EVIDENCE-BASED CARE The PEBC is an initiative of the Ontario provincial cancer system, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) (OH [CCO]). The PEBC mandate is to improve the lives

2020 Cancer Care Ontario

14. Treatment of Patients with Late-Stage Colorectal Cancer Resource-Stratified Guideline Full Text available with Trip Pro

emergency colon or rectal cancer surgery. If resection is not possible, then patients should receive palliative care. , Palliative colostomy should be considered in situations of malignant bowel obstruction. In the assessment of general symptoms, clinicians should determine a patient’s performance status and comorbid conditions, as they can influence the ability to receive and predict the benefit from medical treatment. Diagnosis Recommendations on the methods of diagnosis for patients with colorectal (...) biomarker evaluation guideline. - TABLE 3 Recommendations on Symptom Management TABLE 4 Recommendations on Diagnosis TABLE 5 Recommendations on Staging Symptom Management Recommendations for assisting patients with symptoms of advanced colorectal cancer such as pain or bleeding are in . Discussion. More than 1.8 million patients in the world were diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) in 2018. Among all patients with CRC, 20%-30% have metastatic disease from the outset (synchronous primary tumor

2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology Guidelines

15. Role of gastrointestinal endoscopy in the screening of digestive tract cancers in Europ

because of palliative treatment and new biological treatments for advanced disease. BetterunderstandingofthenaturalhistoryofGIcancershas shown that most of them are preceded by slowly progressing precancerous conditions or lesions, as well as by early invasive stages, therefore providing opportunities for effective inter- ventions. Beyond the classic adenoma–carcinoma sequence for colorectal carcinogenesis, similar pathways based on metaplasia–dysplasia–cancer progression have been shown for upper GI (...) leadtounderuseorpoorresourcingofhealthfacilities involved inprovidingscreeningservices, with consequent failuretofully realizethe potential benefits to patients. Methods In 2017, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Governing Board established a task force (Public Affairs Working Group led by A.S.) to produce a Position Statement concerning the value of endoscopy for screening purposes in GI cancers. The most prevalent digestive cancers (esophageal squamous cellcarcinoma,esophagealadenocarcinoma,gastric carcinoma

2020 European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

16. Incidence of Incisional Hernia Repair After Laparoscopic Compared to Open Resection of Colonic Cancer: A Nationwide Analysis of 17,717 Patients (Abstract)

comprised of patients undergoing resection for colonic cancer between January 2007 and March 2016 according to the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database. Patients who subsequently underwent IHR were identified in the Danish Ventral Hernia Database, from which information about the priority of the hernia repair and the size of the fascial defect was retrieved.The study included 17,717 patients, of whom 482 (2.7%) underwent subsequent IHR during a median follow-up of 4.7 (interquartile range 2.8-6.9 (...) Incidence of Incisional Hernia Repair After Laparoscopic Compared to Open Resection of Colonic Cancer: A Nationwide Analysis of 17,717 Patients It remains unknown whether laparoscopic compared to open surgery translates into fewer incisional hernia repairs (IHR). The objectives of the current study were to compare the long-term incidence of IHR and the size of repaired hernias between patients subjected to laparoscopic or open resection of colonic cancer.This was a nationwide cohort study

2020 EvidenceUpdates

17. Randomized clinical trial of continuous transversus abdominis plane block, epidural or patient-controlled analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery Full Text available with Trip Pro

surgery for colorectal cancer were divided randomly into three groups: combined general-TAP anaesthesia (TAP group), combined general-thoracic epidural anaesthesia (TEA group) and standard general anaesthesia (GA group). The primary endpoint was duration of hospital stay. Secondary endpoints included gastrointestinal motility, pain scores and plasma levels of cytokines.In total, 180 patients were randomized and 165 completed the trial. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that duration of hospital (...) Randomized clinical trial of continuous transversus abdominis plane block, epidural or patient-controlled analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery The optimal analgesia regimen after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery is unclear. The aim of the study was to characterize the beneficial effects of continuous transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks initiated before operation on outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.Patients undergoing

2020 EvidenceUpdates

18. Avapritinib (Ayvakit) - adults with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)

Avapritinib (Ayvakit) - adults with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) Drug Approval Package: AYVAKIT AYVAKIT " /> U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Search FDA Submit search Drug Approval Package: AYVAKIT Company: Blueprint Medicines Corporation Application Number: 212608 Approval Date: 01/09/2020 trong> Persons with disabilities having problems accessing the PDF files below may call (301) 796-3634 for assistance. FDA Approval Letter and Labeling (PDF

2020 FDA - Drug Approval Package

19. Colorectal cancer

with early rectal cancer 23 Preoperative treatment for people with rectal cancer 24 Surgery for people with rectal cancer 26 Surgical technique for people with rectal cancer 27 People with locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer 28 Surgical volumes for rectal cancer operations 29 Preoperative treatment for people with colon cancer 30 Duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for people with colorectal cancer 30 Colonic stents in acute large bowel obstruction 32 Molecular biomarkers to guide systemic anti (...) , and pT4 and/or pN2), performance status, any comorbidities, age and personal preferences. T o find out why the committee made the recommendation on duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for people with colorectal cancer and how it might affect practice, see rationale and impact. Colonic stents in acute large bowel obstruction Colonic stents in acute large bowel obstruction 1.3.15 Consider stenting for people presenting with acute left-sided large bowel obstruction who are to be treated with palliative

2020 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence - Clinical Guidelines

20. Dataset for histopathological reporting of gastrointestinal stromal tumours

infiltrates are prognostic factors in localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Res 2013;73:3499–3510. 29. Brierley J, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours (8th edition). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2017. CEff 090120 16 V3 Final Appendix A SNOMED coding Topography Tumour site SNOMED 2/3 code SNOMED CT terminology SNOMED CT code Oesophagus T-62000/T-56000 Entire oesophagus (body structure) 181245004 Stomach T-63000/T-57000 Entire stomach (body structure) 181246003 (...) allows formulation of a definitive management plan but also is used to: • provide accurate and complete data for cancer registration • provide feedback to other clinical specialties, including surgery, radiology and oncology • allow for high-quality clinical audit and research. GISTs are now considered the most common connective tissue tumour of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. They have been the subject of great interest over the past decade as a much deeper understanding of the underlying molecular

2020 British Society of Gastroenterology