Latest & greatest articles for mesalamine

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on mesalamine or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on mesalamine and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for mesalamine

1. The Efficacy and Safety of Mesalamine and Probiotics in Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (Full text)

The Efficacy and Safety of Mesalamine and Probiotics in Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mesalamine in conjunction with probiotics for ulcerative colitis.Random controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and VIP (VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals) from inception to October 2019. Methodological quality was assessed (...) . For ulcerative colitis (UC), mesalamine and probiotics had better clinical efficacy than mesalamine alone (≤8 weeks: RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.07-1.18, P < 0.0001; >8 weeks: RR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.11-1.41, P=0.0003). On the clinical symptom scores, disease activity index, and endoscopic score, UC patients receiving mesalamine and probiotics had significant difference than patients receiving mesalazine alone (MD = -2.02, 95% CI: -3.28 to -0.76, P=0.002; MD = -1.20, 95% CI: -1.76 to -0.65, P < 0.001; and MD = -0.42

2020 Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM PubMed abstract

2. Comparative assessment of budesonide-MMX and mesalamine in active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. (Abstract)

Comparative assessment of budesonide-MMX and mesalamine in active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. The comparative efficacy, safety and tolerability of budesonide-MMX and oral mesalamine in active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) are unclear. We conducted a network meta-analysis to fill this evidence gap.We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, the Cochrane Library, clinical trial registries, regulatory agencies' websites and international (...) conference proceedings, up to July 2018, to identify randomized controlled trials of adult patients with active, mild-to-moderate UC, comparing budesonide-MMX or mesalamine against placebo, or against each other, or different dosing strategies, for induction of remission. Two reviewers independently abstracted study data and outcomes, and assessed each trial's risk-of-bias.We identified and synthesized evidence from 15 eligible trials including 4083 participants. Budesonide-MMX 9 mg/day and mesalamine

2020 British journal of clinical pharmacology

3. Comparative Effectiveness of Mesalamine, Sulfasalazine, Corticosteroids, and Budesonide for the Induction of Remission in Crohn's Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis: ERRATUM. (Full text)

Comparative Effectiveness of Mesalamine, Sulfasalazine, Corticosteroids, and Budesonide for the Induction of Remission in Crohn's Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis: ERRATUM. 30052984 2019 11 20 1536-4844 23 5 2017 05 01 Inflammatory bowel diseases Inflamm. Bowel Dis. Comparative Effectiveness of Mesalamine, Sulfasalazine, Corticosteroids, and Budesonide for the Induction of Remission in Crohn's Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis: ERRATUM. E25 10.1097/MIB.0000000000001151 eng

2019 Inflammatory Bowel Diseases PubMed abstract

4. Mesalamine

Mesalamine Top results for mesalamine - Trip Database or use your Google+ account Find evidence fast ALL of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document ANY of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document This EXACT phrase: Title only Anywhere in the document EXCLUDING words: Title only Anywhere in the document Timeframe: to: Combine searches by placing the search numbers in the top search box and pressing the search button. An example search might look like (#1 or #2) and (#3 or #4 (...) ) Loading history... Population: Intervention: Comparison: Outcome: Population: Intervention: Latest & greatest articles for mesalamine The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you

2018 Trip Latest and Greatest

5. Mesalamine (5-ASA) for the prevention of recurrent diverticulitis. (Full text)

Mesalamine (5-ASA) for the prevention of recurrent diverticulitis. Diverticular disease is a common condition that increases in prevalence with age. Recent theories on the pathogenesis of diverticular inflammation have implicated chronic inflammation similar to that seen in ulcerative colitis. Mesalamine, or 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), is a mainstay of therapy for individuals with ulcerative colitis. Accordingly, 5-ASA has been studied for prevention of recurrent diverticulitis.To evaluate (...) the efficacy of mesalamine (5-ASA) for prevention of recurrent diverticulitis.We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 8), in the Cochrane Library; Ovid MEDLINE (from 1950 to 9 September 2017); Ovid Embase (from 1974 to 9 September 2017); and two clinical trials registries for ongoing trials - Clinicaltrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform database (9 September 2017).We also searched proceedings from

2017 Cochrane PubMed abstract

6. Kangfuxinye Enema Combined with Mesalamine for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and GRADE Approach. (Full text)

Kangfuxinye Enema Combined with Mesalamine for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and GRADE Approach. To critically appraise the efficacy and safety of Kangfuxinye enema combined with mesalamine for the ulcerative colitis (UC) patients and in addition to grade the quality of evidence by using the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation) approach.A literature search was performed in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang (...) Databases. The search restrictions were patients with UC and RCTs. Studies including other treatments except Kangfuxinye with mesalamine were excluded.Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. We found significant benefits of Kangfuxinye combined with mesalamine against mesalamine alone in improving response rate as well as reducing the recurrence rate and inflammation rate; meanwhile, the increase of the adverse events rate was not observed. Furthermore, the symptoms remission rate and the cure time

2017 Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM PubMed abstract

7. Comparative Effectiveness of Mesalamine, Sulfasalazine, Corticosteroids, and Budesonide for the Induction of Remission in Crohn's Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis: Republished. (Full text)

Comparative Effectiveness of Mesalamine, Sulfasalazine, Corticosteroids, and Budesonide for the Induction of Remission in Crohn's Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis: Republished. Induction treatment of mild-to-moderate Crohn's disease is controversial.To compare the induction of remission between different doses of mesalamine, sulfasalazine, corticosteroids, and budesonide for active Crohn's disease.We identified randomized controlled trials from existing Cochrane reviews and an updated (...) literature search in Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL to November 2015.We included randomized controlled trials (n = 22) in adult patients with Crohn's disease that compared budesonide, sulfasalazine, mesalamine, or corticosteroids with placebo or each other, for the induction of remission (8-17 wks). Mesalamine (above and below 2.4 g/d) and budesonide (above and below 6 mg/d) were stratified into low and high doses.Our primary outcome was remission, defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index score <150

2017 Inflammatory Bowel Diseases PubMed abstract

8. Comparative Effectiveness of Mesalamine, Sulfasalazine, Corticosteroids, and Budesonide for the Induction of Remission in Crohn's Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis. (Full text)

Comparative Effectiveness of Mesalamine, Sulfasalazine, Corticosteroids, and Budesonide for the Induction of Remission in Crohn's Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis. Induction treatment of mild-to-moderate Crohn's disease is controversial.To compare the induction of remission between different doses of mesalamine, sulfasalazine, corticosteroids, and budesonide for active Crohn's disease.We identified randomized controlled trials from existing Cochrane reviews and an updated literature (...) search in Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL to November 2015.We included randomized controlled trials (n = 22) in adult patients with Crohn's disease that compared budesonide, sulfasalazine, mesalamine, or corticosteroids with placebo or each other, for the induction of remission (8-17 wks). Mesalamine (above and below 2.4 g/d) and budesonide (above and below 6 mg/d) were stratified into low and high doses.Our primary outcome was remission, defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index score <150

2017 Inflammatory Bowel Diseases PubMed abstract

9. Once daily versus multiple daily mesalamine therapy for mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. (Abstract)

Once daily versus multiple daily mesalamine therapy for mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. 5-Aminosalicylic acid is the first-line drug for mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). The most commonly used 5-aminosalicylic acid is mesalamine. Several systematic reviews have demonstrated that mesalamine is effective in inducing and maintaining remission. Efficacy, safety and adherence to once daily (OD) and multiple daily (MD) dosing of mesalamine for the induction (...) and MD dosing for maintenance and induction of remission. No significant differences were noted in rates of medication adherence or adverse events between OD and MD dosing. With regard to mesalamine suppository, no significant differences were noted for comparisons between dosing regimens and adverse events for induction of remission.OD dose of mesalamine is as effective and safe as MD doses for the induction and maintenance treatment of mild to moderate UC. OD mesalamine given as a suppository can

2016 Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland

10. Mesalamine Does Not Help Prevent Recurrent Acute Colonic Diverticulitis: Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials. (Abstract)

Mesalamine Does Not Help Prevent Recurrent Acute Colonic Diverticulitis: Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials. 27125717 2017 10 30 2018 11 13 1572-0241 111 4 2016 04 The American journal of gastroenterology Am. J. Gastroenterol. Mesalamine Does Not Help Prevent Recurrent Acute Colonic Diverticulitis: Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials. 579-81 10.1038/ajg.2016.24 Khan Muhammad Ali MA Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Tennessee Health (...) 4Q81I59GXC Mesalamine IM Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;111(11):1657-1658 27808135 Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;111(11):1656-1657 27808151 Acute Disease Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal therapeutic use Diverticulitis, Colonic prevention & control Humans Mesalamine therapeutic use Odds Ratio Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Recurrence 2016 4 30 6 0 2016 4 30 6 0 2017 10 31 6 0 ppublish 27125717 ajg201624 10.1038/ajg.2016.24 BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6 18436948 Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Oct

2016 The American journal of gastroenterology

11. Long-Term Benefit of Mesalamine Granules for Patients Who Achieved Corticosteroid-Induced Ulcerative Colitis Remission. (Full text)

Long-Term Benefit of Mesalamine Granules for Patients Who Achieved Corticosteroid-Induced Ulcerative Colitis Remission. Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who achieve remission with corticosteroids often relapse after tapering or discontinuation; alternative treatments limiting steroid exposure and UC relapse would be beneficial. It remains uncertain whether patients with corticosteroid-induced remission experience benefit with mesalamine granules (MG), a locally acting aminosalicylate

2016 Digestive diseases and sciences PubMed abstract

12. Once-daily versus multiple-daily mesalamine for patients with ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. (Abstract)

Once-daily versus multiple-daily mesalamine for patients with ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. To systematically review the efficacy and safety of once-daily (OD) mesalamine for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) compared with multiple-daily (MD) mesalamine.Electronic databases up to July 2011 were searched for related studies evaluating the efficacy of OD vs MD for treatment of UC. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were considered eligible. Remission rates or relapse rates (...) were analyzed using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis. Pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Publication bias was assessed with a funnel plot.Overall 10 RCTs including 9 full-text manuscripts and one abstract met the inclusion criteria. OD dosing of mesalamine was shown to be as effective as MD dosing for the maintenance of clinical remission in patients with quiescent UC (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.89-1.12) by ITT analysis. For active UC, a mild

2014 Journal of digestive diseases

13. Budesonide is more effective than mesalamine or placebo in short-term treatment of collagenous colitis (Full text)

Budesonide is more effective than mesalamine or placebo in short-term treatment of collagenous colitis Studies reporting that budesonide is effective for the treatment of collagenous colitis have been small and differed in efficacy measures. Mesalamine has been proposed as a treatment option for collagenous colitis, although its efficacy has never been investigated in placebo-controlled trials. We performed a phase 3, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate budesonide and mesalamine (...) as short-term treatments for collagenous colitis.Patients with active collagenous colitis were randomly assigned to groups given pH-modified release oral budesonide capsules (9 mg budesonide once daily, Budenofalk, n = 30), mesalamine granules (3 g mesalamine once daily, Salofalk, n = 25), or placebo for 8 weeks (n = 37) in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion. The study was conducted in 31 centers (hospital clinics and private practices) in Germany, Denmark, Lithuania, Spain, and the United Kingdom

2014 EvidenceUpdates Controlled trial quality: predicted high PubMed abstract

14. Once-daily versus multiple-daily mesalamine for patients with ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis

Once-daily versus multiple-daily mesalamine for patients with ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis Untitled Document The CRD Databases will not be available from 08:00 BST on Friday 4th October until 08:00 BST on Monday 7th October for essential maintenance. We apologise for any inconvenience.

2012 DARE.

15. Purine analogues compared with mesalamine or 5-ASA for the prevention of postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis (Abstract)

Purine analogues compared with mesalamine or 5-ASA for the prevention of postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis Objective:  To use a meta-analysis approach to evaluate the efficacy and safety of purine analogues, azathioprine (AZA) and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), in the prevention of postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease (CD), as compared with mesalamine or 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA). Methods:  The Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Embase literature databases were (...) searched for relevant studies with the key words "azathioprine", "6-mercaptopurine", "purine analogue", "mesalamine", or "5-ASA". The efficacy and safety of purine analogues in the retrieved randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were evaluated with RevMan 5.0.25 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, England) and STATA 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). The outcome measures of AZA and 6-MP, compared to mesalamine and 5-ASA (control arms), were: clinical recurrence, endoscopic recurrence

2012 EvidenceUpdates

16. Once-Daily MMX(R) Mesalamine for Endoscopic Maintenance of Remission of Ulcerative Colitis (Abstract)

Once-Daily MMX(R) Mesalamine for Endoscopic Maintenance of Remission of Ulcerative Colitis Treatment with mesalamine to maintain endoscopic remission (mucosal healing) of ulcerative colitis (UC) has been shown to reduce the risk of relapse and is the recommended first-line maintenance therapy. To improve treatment adherence, a mesalamine formulation that can be administered once-daily, MMX(®) mesalamine (Lialda; Shire Pharmaceuticals LLC, Wayne, PA), was developed. This study was conducted (...) to determine the efficacy and safety of once-daily MMX mesalamine compared with twice-daily delayed-release mesalamine (Asacol; Warner Chilcott, Dublin, Ireland) for maintaining endoscopic remission in patients with UC.A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 6-month, active-control trial was conducted to assess the non-inferiority of once-daily MMX mesalamine 2.4 g/day compared with twice-daily delayed-release mesalamine at a total daily dose of 1.6 g/day in patients with UC in endoscopic remission

2012 EvidenceUpdates Controlled trial quality: predicted high

17. Once-Daily Dosing vs. Conventional Dosing Schedule of Mesalamine and Relapse of Quiescent Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Abstract)

Once-Daily Dosing vs. Conventional Dosing Schedule of Mesalamine and Relapse of Quiescent Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Maintenance therapy with 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs) is recommended in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis (UC), but compliance rates are low. Once-daily dosing may improve adherence, but impact on the relapse of disease activity is unclear as no previous meta-analysis has studied this issue.MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane central register (...) -daily vs. more frequent dosing schedule was reported as relative risk (RR) of relapse with a 95% confidence interval (CI).The search identified 3,061 citations, and seven RCTs containing 2,745 patients were eligible. All RCTs used mesalamine. Relapse rates were not significantly different between once-daily and conventional dosing schedules for mesalamine (RR of relapse=0.94; 95% CI: 0.82-1.08). Non-compliance (RR=0.87; 95% CI: 0.46-1.66) and adverse events were no more likely with once-daily dosing

2012 EvidenceUpdates

18. Once daily oral mesalamine compared to conventional dosing for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (Abstract)

Once daily oral mesalamine compared to conventional dosing for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. We systematically reviewed and compared the efficacy and safety of once daily (OD) mesalamine to conventional dosing for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (UC). A literature search to January 2012 identified all applicable randomized trials. Study quality was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (...) 0.87 95% CI 0.68-1.10), or relapse at 6 (RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.83-1.46) or 12 months (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.83-1.03). Subgroup analyses showed no important differences in efficacy. No significant difference was demonstrated in rates of medication adherence or adverse events between OD and conventional dosing. OD mesalamine appears to be as effective and safe as conventional dosing for both the treatment of mild to moderately active UC and for maintenance of remission in quiescent UC. The failure

2012 Inflammatory bowel diseases

19. Budesonide 9 mg is at least as effective as mesalamine 4.5 g in patients with mildly to moderately active Crohn`s disease (Full text)

Budesonide 9 mg is at least as effective as mesalamine 4.5 g in patients with mildly to moderately active Crohn`s disease Comparative data on budesonide vs mesalamine for the treatment of mild-to-moderately active Crohn's disease (CD) are sparse. We assessed the efficacy and safety of each therapy in patients with mildly to moderately active CD.We performed a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, 8-week, multicenter study in which 309 patients with mildly to moderately active CD received pH (...) -modified-release oral budesonide (9 mg/day once daily or 3 mg/day 3 times daily) or Eudragit-L-coated oral mesalamine (4.5 g/day).The primary efficacy variable, clinical remission (defined as Crohn's Disease Activity Index ≤150), at the final visit occurred in 69.5% (107 of 154) of patients given budesonide vs 62.1% (95 of 153) of patients given mesalamine (difference, 7.4%; 95% repeated confidence interval, -4.6% to 18.0%; P = .001 for noninferiority). Clinical remission rates did not differ

2011 EvidenceUpdates Controlled trial quality: predicted high PubMed abstract

20. Once-daily dosing of delayed-release oral mesalamine (400-mg tablet) is as effective as twice-daily dosing for maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis (Abstract)

Once-daily dosing of delayed-release oral mesalamine (400-mg tablet) is as effective as twice-daily dosing for maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis The practice of dosing mesalamines in divided doses for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) began with sulfasalazine and was driven by sulfapyridine toxicity. This convention and the assumption that dosing multiple times a day is necessary to treat UC had not been challenged until recently. This study was conducted to determine (...) the efficacy and safety of once-daily dosing of delayed-release mesalamine (Asacol 400-mg tablets) compared with twice-daily dosing for maintaining remission in UC patients.A multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded, 12-month, active-control trial was conducted to assess the noninferiority of delayed-release mesalamine 1.6-2.4 g/day administered once daily compared with twice daily in patients with mild-to-moderate UC currently in clinical remission. The primary end point was maintenance of clinical

2010 EvidenceUpdates Controlled trial quality: uncertain